My husband is studying writing (take a moment and have a look at his blog: www.bookofpete.com). I’m very happy about this because he is proving to be really quite good at it and is producing numerous highly readable fragments of fantastic stories that leave me wanting more, like some kind of literary degustation menu. In addition, there are new ideas and books coming into the house, which is the best part of living with a student. So I was very interested when he informed me that Anthony Bourdain’s The Nasty Bits was on the current reading list. I’m a late comer to Anthony Bourdain and to be honest it took me a while to warm to him and see past the whole annoying New York shtick thing. The thaw started when I saw his insightful and genuinely moving No Reservations episode in Laos. Then came Tokyo, and somewhere between the Kendo and the fresh killed, pink cooked yakitori chicken porn I had melted completely. No surprises there. So now it’s official – I have a bit of a crush on Anthony B.
Which brings me to his Nasty Bits, which is now right up there with other favourite essay collections by viciously clever men such as David Foster Wallace’s A Supposedly Fun Thing I’ll Never Do Again and Martin Amis’ The Moronic Inferno. Among numerous hilarious, angry and insightful essays there is one so far that really touched a nerve: “Are you a Crip or a Blood?”. Bourdain’s Crips and Bloods are actually drawn from yet another novel (excuse me while this post is sucked up into a sphincter of post-modernist referentialism), Timothy Taylor’s Stanley Park. Crips are insane, driven seekers of the culinary ‘other’ who will go to considerable lengths to obtain the newest, the best, the most exotic of ingredients. The Bloods are the purists, the locavores. I’m mostly a Blood – it’s just that I was born in the wrong country. Continue reading →